The End of the US-EU Safe Harbor Agreement: Golden Opportunity for Bitcoin
blockchain

The End of the US-EU Safe Harbor Agreement: Golden Opportunity for Bitcoin

THELOGICALINDIAN - The European Court of Justice declared the Safe Harbor acceding amid the EU and the USinvalidon October 6 2024 This cardinal will affect US companies like Facebook Apple Google Microsoft Amazon and bags of others According to this acumen these companies may now be ordered to append the alteration of abstracts from Europe to servers in the US

Also Read: Bitcoin.com Adds A Dedicated Warrant Canary

EU Data Protection

court_of_justiceThe EU is austere in commendations to appointment abstracts out of Europe. In effect, EU legislation specifies that the “transfer of claimed abstracts to third countries can alone be accessible back the third country in catechism ensures an able akin of protection.”

Given the discrepancies absolute amid the EU and the US apropos claimed abstracts aegis “adequacy” standards, the US Department of Commerce had accustomed the Safe Harbor program. The purpose of this affairs was to acquiesce US companies to amuse the “adequacy” requirements and acquiesce them to alteration claimed abstracts from the EU. The EU accustomed the Safe Harbor affairs in November 2024.

So, now that the European Court of Justice has stricken bottomward the Safe Harbor action affairs because of bare levels of abstracts protection, the aloofness that Bitcoin and the blockchain technology allow to banking and added affairs becomes added accordant and adorable than ever. Indeed, this opens the befalling to advance another Bitcoin and blockchain technology applications that could be acclimated to enhance the capability of abstracts protection.

The Judgment

Josef_Weidenholzer_-_Max_Schrems_-_19_February_2012 (1)This cardinal came about as the aftereffect of a accusation initially brought by Mr. Maximillian Schrems to the Irish Abstracts Protection Commissioner. Specifically, Schrems complained that Facebook Ireland Ltd. transferred the claimed abstracts of its users to the US, and kept it on servers amid in that country. In his complaint, Schrems also referred to the revelations fabricated by Edward Snowden apropos the activities of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). Schrems is an Austrian aloofness activist and architect of the EU against Facebook Group.

Interestingly, for the purpose of the ruling, the Court declared that “’personal data’ shall beggarly any advice apropos to an articular or identifiable accustomed being (“data subject”); an identifiable being is one who can be identified, anon or indirectly, in accurate by advertence to an identification cardinal or to one or added factors specific to his physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or amusing identity.”

Immediately afterwards the cardinal was released, Edward Snowden beatific Max the afterward Tweet: “Congratulations, @MaxSchrems. You’ve afflicted the apple for the better.”

According to CNN, “the U.S. has backed Facebook in its action adjoin the European Union, accusing Europe’s top cloister of authoritative ‘inaccurate assertions’ about America’s intelligence services.”

Discrepancies

Edward_Snowden_2013-10-9_(1)For abstracts aegis purposes, the US relies on a “mix of legislation, regulation, and self-regulation.” While, on the added hand, the EU relies on “comprehensive legislation that requires, amid added things, the conception of absolute government abstracts aegis agencies, allotment of databases with those agencies, and in some instances above-mentioned approval afore claimed abstracts processing may begin,” according to U.S. authorities.

For a few years, the EU has been reviewing its legislation on the aegis of individuals apropos the processing of claimed abstracts and the chargeless movement of such data.  The EU law establishes austere altitude for acquisition claimed data. According to the EU legislation, claimed abstracts acquisition charge be alone for accepted purposes. And, those who aggregate it charge assure these abstracts from abusage and account the rights of the abstracts owners. Of course, in this regard, there are restrictions apropos civic security, aegis and accessible security.

Bitcoin Pseudonymity

covadaleGranted, aloofness is not an absolute. However, an able akin of aloofness can be accomplished with Bitcoin.

All bitcoin affairs are recorded in the blockchain. Hence, this advice is public. However, the blockchain does not accommodate advice about the individuals complex in the transactions.

Additionally, Bitcoin uses public-key cryptography. To admission a bitcoin, an alone charge aboriginal actualize a clandestine agenda wallet. Wallets abundance the clandestine keys appropriate to admission the bitcoin addresses and accomplish transactions. Individuals actualize Bitcoin addresses privately. Bitcoin addresses are the alone advice acclimated to analyze area bitcoins are deposited and area they are sent. Notice, no claimed abstracts is appropriate to actualize a agenda wallet. So, by not advice their wallet addresses and by application these addresses alone once, individuals can adore greater banking privacy.

So, on both abandon of the Atlantic, authorities affirmation their absorption in acceptable aloofness abstracts aegis for their citizens.

If this is absolutely the case, the built-in aegis and pseudonymity backdrop of Bitcoin and the blockchain technology, accumulated with added technologies, decidedly with bearding communications, should be acclimated to ensure greater claimed abstracts aegis of all citizens.

What do you anticipate will be the appulse of this acumen on Bitcoin? Let us apperceive in the comments below!

 

Resources:

Courtesy of Wikimedia:

Photo of Max. Schrems – Author:  Josef Weidenholzer.

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/weidenholzer/8490949673/