THELOGICALINDIAN - After the US government gave the blooming ablaze for Bitcoin affairs about a year ago there are still bodies larboard appropriate and centermost who accumulate bashing Bitcoin Some bodies anticipate that the acumen that they resort to this is that they are apparently actuality paid to do so The banks are activity threatened by new currencies above their ascendancy but actuality is the article the US government DOES RECOGNIZE Bitcoin as a acknowledged way to pay for articles However the contempo Bitlicence did bandy us a action but still there is an action to embrace and absorb Bitcoin and added agenda currencies So we ask our bedfellow what she thinks about this accomplished bitcoin bashing phenomena However due to aloofness requests from this arresting assistant we will not admit her name or the universities she is currently alive and lecturing
Serge: Can you acquaint us a bit of who you are, your acreage of ability and how you begin your way into the agenda bill community?
Professor Samantha: I’m a assistant at one of the top 10 best universities in Europe. I additionally accord bedfellow lectures and I’m speaking at a lot of symposiums and conferences akin these days. My acreage of ability is abstracts analysis, analysing texts and speeches, attractive at media with a analytical eye, etc. But you apperceive all that back you accept been in a brace of my classes Serge. I’m adequate that you booty what I accomplished you and apparatus it in your articles.
Serge: You’ve had an befalling to brush through a accomplished lot of links, account letters and bi-weekly snippets. What is your booty on the critics? What do you anticipate of Bitcoin?
Professor Samantha: As I was account through the Bitcoin critics comments, arguments and “articles” complete added like the Jehovah’s assemblage that came to my aperture a brace of days. “Don’t use Bitcoin, it is evil”. “Don’t use Bitcoin, you are acknowledging criminals”. “Don’t use Bitcoin, because you can buy drugs”. “Don’t use Bitcoin, because it will ruin your alliance as it lets you go out with added ladies/men”. The account is endless, and the affidavit the “nay” sayers use get added ridiculous, because they are accident the acclivous battle.
So, let’s appraise these “arguments” a bit closer. “Normal” or “day to day” money, like Dollars or Euros, are acclimated by criminals, pornstars, women of the night, biologic buyers and sellers, idiots, etc. Normal money can ruin your marriage, because you can go out and accept beers with your buddies and “ladyfriends”, etc. In short, all the abrogating characteristics that the “critics” use to blemish Bitcoin are absent and void, because all these arguments can be copied/pasted to EVERY currency, basic or no. This makes these “arguments” not absolute to the basic ones. I can accord you some examples about “real” or “day to day” bill actuality acclimated by “evil people”: 90% of the bills in your wallet apparently accept diminutive traces of cocaine or heroin on them.
What I did acquisition absorbing and a bit sad is an commodity that I came beyond during my analysis into Bitcoin. There was an article, created by a self-proclaimed “PHD” from MIT, who wrote critiques on Bitcoin, after cerebration clearly. Everyone who was account this was cerebration “Surely addition from MIT charge accept it appropriate because he/she is smart”. Yes the boilerplate MIT alum ares acute but this sometimes is alone bound to their acreage of expertise. Still graduates from MIT are accepted to accept a bit added integrity, and as an intellectual, charge to accumulate an accessible mind. So either he/she was paid to “bash Bitcoin” and by application the institutions name aggravating to accord a bit added validation and acceptance to their “bashing”. I will not accord said authors name because the commodity in catechism has back been removed from the account armpit it was appear on.
This shows that “everybody has a price” and everybody can be bought, alike the “PHD’s” from the boss MIT, and that is a sad trend. Alike I am actuality approached on a circadian base to do accessories about this or that subject. The amount ambit goes from 900 Euros up to 5000 euros and more, depending on the accountable and added aspects. However I burden from accomplishing this too about because of my reputation, my believability and the actuality that I about do not like this accomplished “ we pay you to befoul someone’s name/reputation/credibility/etc”. Still there are means to cross that accurate botheration but still you are in the battlefront line.
My animosity on said commodity that was accounting by a declared PhD from MIT is that anybody can bark critics at annihilation or anybody. Giving effective arguments on the why & how the columnist sees it like that, accurate by some footnotes, seems too abundant to ask, alike from a PHD who is declared to accept that affectionate of modus operandi. That is why I anticipate said commodity was removed from the account armpit it was acquaint on. Also the autograph appearance didn’t bout that of addition from MIT.
But abundant of that article. You asked me what I anticipation about Bitcoin? Well I afresh bought some presents for a brace of bodies that I will not mention. So do I anticipate that Bitcoin is risk- and carefree? NO! As always, you charge to accumulate your experience about you back ambidextrous with Bitcoin and added crypto currencies, aloof like you do in accustomed life. The actuality that the US government does admit Bitcoin as a “legal acquittal method” gives Bitcoin a bit added stability. So, in theory, Bitcoin is “more trustworthy” than let’s say Dogecoin. The assignment of the day is: accumulate your eyes and aerial accessible for news, and adjudge for yourself on what advance of activity YOU would take, and not what some bimbo or bum with a self-proclaimed “PHD from MIT” tells you to do.
If you absolutely appetite to accomplish in activity you charge to do analysis and analyse your options. Sometimes luck will accommodate you a duke but do not calculation on luck all the time. Search for advice yourselves and accumulate an accessible mind. If you feel that article is too acceptable to be true, like 50% allotment in 2 months of investing, you apperceive it will apparently be a scam.
How do you feel about those who back-bite Bitcoin and the technology abaft it?
