THELOGICALINDIAN - As I apprehend the Bitcoin account anniversary day and see the amount of bitcoin cycling up and bottomward Ive been cerebration about the altered abandon of the blockchain ascent agitation and apprehensive what the best band-aid is for miners While I apprehend that abounding of us arresting via our basin our abutment of one angle or addition a abiding accord seems ambiguous As abutment for one angle accouterment to addition the armament that represent one abstraction or addition about-face to a altered acceptance adjustment and that can be arresting for those of us who accept had to change pools and reconfigure in some cases abounding miners
I accede myself a hobbyist. I accept 20 or so miners, best of which alone abutment SHA256, in a colo. But back I add things up, I calmly accept added than $30k invested in my mining hardware. If you say it out loud, it feels like a huge investment, and if bitcoin were to aback go bankrupt due to a adamantine fork, or fundamentally, bickering, it would absolutely be a huge accident to me and my family. This is why I anticipate it so important for all of us to anticipate actual actively about the approaching of bitcoin. People allocution about all sorts of things—payment systems, etc.—but the affair that absolutely matters, from my point of view, is the accessible ledger.
In my day job, I am in allegation of action architectonics for a above corporation. This corporation, like so abounding others, invests basic in addition and research, and blockchain technology is a focus of some of these investments. But no amount what types of blockchain tech you’re attractive at, the “big” blockchain is bitcoin. For now. In adjustment for bitcoin to advance its dominance, it needs to calibration to assorted applications—not aloof blow on its aboriginal “killer app,” which is the bread itself. When we attending at off-chain ascent solutions, the big affair I accept is how abounding another chains will exist. When those chains activate to aces up on the befalling inherent in non-coin transactions, we, as miners, accept absent the battle. The above antecedent of fees in the continued appellation will clear into the pockets of the bodies who run those alternating chains.
Last week, we all had the befalling to apprehend what exchanges were activity to do if there was a fork. Then exchanges said that the certificate they had active maybe didn’t attending the aforementioned as it did back it was signed. Why was the document’s assortment not appear to the blockchain? Why weren’t the signatures cryptographic? Why can’t we accept an accurate almanac of who active absolutely what? We can’t because there is no room. That document’s assortment would accept bulk an unrealistic bulk of money to bury due to accepted admeasurement restrictions and the antic excess of abstracts cat-and-mouse for a block.
Perhaps the exchanges could accept acclimated an alternating blockchain. I am abiding Ethereum would adulation to accept that business. The accuracy though, is that business should be ours. With a capricious block size, companies and individuals would accept the adeptness to bury affairs of all types into the blockchain. Such affairs will aloof become added common over time and forth with the bread abridgement would drive huge fees due to volume, not scarcity, to our mining community. Anyone who has absorbed themselves to the absence wagon is in for a abrupt surprise. Someone is consistently accommodating to do article cheaper. Sometimes they can alike do it cheaper and better.
Let’s not accord up our boss position as the capital blockchain that anybody wants their affairs accounting to. Take time, and accomplish a choice—a best that will advance our abiding position as the coin, and the blockchain for the future. If, as miners, we don’t act now, I assure you, addition will accomplish a best for us, and it won’t be the best abiding best for our wallets.
This is an Op-ed article. The opinions bidding in this commodity are the author’s own. Bitcoin.com does not endorse nor abutment views, opinions or abstracts fatigued in this post. Bitcoin.com is not amenable for or accountable for any content, accurateness or affection aural the Op-ed article. Readers should do their own due activity afore demography any accomplishments accompanying to the content. Bitcoin.com is not responsible, anon or indirectly, for any accident or accident acquired or declared to be acquired by or in affiliation with the use of or assurance on any advice in this Op-ed article. The opinions bidding in this commodity are my own angle and not those of Cisco.
Do you accede or disagree with Michael Myers? Let us apperceive in the comments below. Are you maybe a C-level controlling at a aggressive company? You are acceptable to advance your own Op-ed rebuttal. Send an email to editor (at) bitcoin.com.
