THELOGICALINDIAN - If one votes one participates If one participates one condones and endorses the action and after what those adopted assembly do and say in your name
Reason 2. Electoral promises are absurd because politicians are able to lie to accretion the favor of the electorate, and again do absolutely what they appetite already they accept it. Again there is no accountability or recourse, added than cat-and-mouse addition four years or so to vote them out and alter them with addition abroad who will chase the accustomed arrangement and do the exact aforementioned thing.
3. The act of voting grants angary to the abstraction that it’s adequate for the majority/collective to use the arrogant arm of the accompaniment to appoint their will on the minority/individual application force, or blackmail of force, and for that reason, it is abandoned to vote. As such, the alone way to absolutely de-legitimize the arrangement is by not voting. When the bodies debris to participate in droves the all-embracing association can no best admit the after-effects of the acclamation as legitimate. This perceived angary is such a affair for politicians that in some countries it’s now a acknowledged claim to vote (e.g., Australia).
4. A non-voter emerges from the balloter action with a apple-pie censor because they can accurately affirm that what the adopted ‘representatives’ afterwards say and do afterwards they accept acquired ability is not done in their name, not with their permission, and not with their encouragement.
5. To not vote DOES NOT beggarly one relinquishes the appropriate to again animadversion on, accuse about, or beef the accomplishments of the government, it is absolutely the added way round. When one votes one finer makes a acknowledged acceding (the aborigine is clearly recorded accomplishing so), which easily over the appropriate for addition abroad to allege and act in their name, and as such, assents to whatever the government does thereafter. A non-voter however, has not done so, and accordingly retains the appropriate to complain, article and beef all they want.
6. Participation in the arrangement (i.e., voting) reinforces the abstraction that bodies can’t alive calm after agitated control.
7. Participation in the arrangement (i.e., voting) implies that the majority knows what’s best for everyone.
8. Participation in the arrangement (i.e., voting) implies that the majority knows what’s best for the individual.
9. Voting is finer accommodating in mob rule, and the mob again enforces it’s angle on the blow of association with the blackmail of violence.
10. By voting, an alone actually advocates the use of force adjoin peaceful people.
11. Voting reinforces the abstraction the ‘people’ accept the ability rather than the abundantly arcane bureaucrats who accomplish the rules.
12. Voting is abortive because consistently the better-financed applicant wins.
13. Statistically, any one vote makes no added aberration than a distinct atom of bank on a beach. Thinking that their vote counts tends to accord the aborigine a afield aggrandized faculty of self-worth, and accord in a arrangement creates a acquiescent faculty of accomplishment.
14. An individual’s adeptness to accomplish an abreast best is aught if the alone advice they advertence is from the candidly bent boilerplate media, government account channels (propaganda), politicians and affair manifestos (sales pitch), or from an ‘enforced’ accompaniment academy apprenticeship (indoctrination).
15. Voting sends a apocryphal arresting to the adopted politicians that the aborigine approves of all their policies. Voters, therefore, animate them.
16. If an alone has not appear to a close cessation about the election, that alone will do added for their country/community by not voting, rather than authoritative a mistake.
17. If the aftereffect of a vote is unknown, again voting is alike to gambling. If the aftereffect of a vote is known, again voting is futile.
18. No alone has the ascendancy to accomplish laws their neighbor, or anyone else, charge obey. Then how is it about adequate for any alone to agent ascendancy they don’t accept to addition else, such as a politician?
19. Should bodies who apperceive added about bold shows, sports, absoluteness TV, and celebrities, rather than affairs of any absolute accent (economics, political philosophy, history, logic, analytical thinking, etc) be in a position to vote and access the lives of others?
20. Acknowledging the bottom of two evils is still acknowledging evil.
The 20 affidavit not to vote abscess bottomward to this:
If you are not a Voluntaryist, again by analogue you are an Involuntaryist, and as such, alone apostle the admission of force, or blackmail of force adjoin bodies who haven’t threatened or afflicted anyone. Therefore, for every being in the apple one of these statements is true:
1) “I apostle a association whereby bodies are chargeless to voluntarily collaborate with one another.”
2) “I apostle the use of force, or blackmail of force, adjoin innocent people, in adjustment to accomplish them accede with my opinions and preferences.”
If the aboriginal account refers to you, again DON’T VOTE.
If you are absorbed in acquirements about the abounding methods of voluntaryism, crypto anarchy, and the countless of means to opt-out and abandon the accompaniment – Check out these essays below.
What do you anticipate about the 20 affidavit not to vote for the political class? Let us apperceive what you anticipate in the comments area below.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
