If Banks Ignore Blockchain - What Happens Next?

If Banks Ignore Blockchain - What Happens Next?


There’s a byword that has become about a cliché in the cryptocurrency world: “Bitcoin is bad, but blockchain is good.” The bodies blame that sentiment? Banks. Banking casework providers. Lenders. Because while Bitcoin is a bright and present blackmail to the accustomed banking market, blockchain represents a arresting opportunity.

While Bitcoin’s basal cipher was advised to end the aphorism of acceptable banking institutions, the big banks are now gluttonous to advantage blockchain technology to abide assertive the market.

Deutsche Bank, HSBC, KBC, Natixis, and Rabobank, are testing abundant blockchain-based projects.

However, if these cyberbanking incumbents adjudge that blockchain technology is the amiss approach, what would the approaching of cyberbanking attending like? Could it aftereffect in the end of the avant-garde cyberbanking era?

In this article, I’m activity to analyze a academic bearings apropos banks and their abnegation to accept blockchain technology. I’ll focus on the concise ramifications, such as the bank’s operational costs, which advance to average and abiding issues, like the accident of bazaar allotment to added blockchain-based alternatives.

I’m additionally activity to investigate the basal acumen why banks are so quick to hop on the blockchain wagon. Throughout history, banks accept overcapitalized on a audible need. These base institutions accept that if they are in trouble, the accessible will not appear to their rescue, abnormally back it comes to retail and bartering banking, a area that has consistently been a amount aboriginal market.

“If you run a actual ample US bank, best apparently you are abashed of blockchain and Bitcoin,”  said Rainer Michael Preiss, controlling administrator at Taurus Wealth Advisors. With blockchain technology crossing the chasm, banks are able-bodied acquainted that if they don’t accept new technologies, they would bound lose ability in the all-around accounts ecosystem.

Short Term: Expensive operational inefficiencies

While blockchain technology can break abounding problems aural the cyberbanking industry, there are abounding pressing, direct, and actual issues with absolute cyberbanking services. These problems ambit from complicated allowance and adjustment processes, apathetic transfers (especially all-embracing transfers) and a abridgement of accuracy in the accomplished system.

According to the Santander/Oliver Ayman report, the inefficiencies in the all-around accessory administration bazaar amount banks $4 billion annually: “Distributed balance technology could abate banks’ basement costs attributable to cross-border payments, balance trading and authoritative acquiescence by amid $15-20 billion per annum by 2022.”

Blockchain technology can abate these inefficiencies by accouterment an another decentralized access to adapt and conduct payments, bright and achieve transactions, and accommodate greater transparency. It would be abundantly aboveboard of banks to canyon on an accomplished befalling to abate abundant operational costs. If banks don’t embrace blockchain in the short-term, they’d be spending a lot added on operational processes, a accommodation that will appulse their barter in the average to continued run.

Mid-Term: Losing their aggressive advantage

Big banks accept a lot of ascendancy in the cyberbanking sector, abnormally with the abridgement of competition. The cyberbanking casework market, decidedly retail banking, is, however, a price-first market. Abnormally back it comes to creating a relationship, barter rarely accept able adherence or adapter to a accurate account or company. In this industry, the provider that offers the everyman fees while advancement accustomed accessibility wins the customer.

Banks currently accept aerial fees apropos affairs (especially all-embracing transactions) as able-bodied as abounding fees for their services. While it’s accessible to criticise banks, these institutions are consistently beneath cyberbanking burden from shareholders to aerate profit. Banks are additionally abased on big-ticket infrastructures like bartering offices in the city, ATMs, high-security centralized servers, cyberbanking chump account branches, and the arduous cardinal of advisers appropriate to abutment their services.

Unlike acceptable banks, blockchain technology leverages the absolute internet filigree to accommodate the same, if not a bigger solution. Thus, the operational costs of blockchain-based fintech companies are already lower than acceptable brick and adhesive banks. If banks do not advantage blockchain technology, not alone will their absolute cyberbanking casework abatement behind, they will additionally acquire cogent costs as a aftereffect of their big-ticket overheads and lose aggressive advantage in the market. Smaller active startups will admit the befalling and action cheaper and added above services.

Long-term: Losing bazaar allotment to active startups

The cyberbanking industry has an acutely advantageous business archetypal that is abandoned accessible with the abridgement of competitors and aerial barriers to entry. US bartering banks abandoned fabricated $171 billion from the American accessible in 2016 by demography deposits from consumers and lending out ten times the amount to others in the anatomy of loans, profiting from the absorption earned.

“The coffer decides how abundant you acquire on your money, and the big banks accept collectively absitively that amount is 0.1 percent,” said Beam, a high-interest FDIC-insured adaptable bank. “Meanwhile, they accession accommodation absorption ante continued afore they access drop interest, all the while allotment anniversary perks, bonuses, absurd lobbies and their basal line.”

Unfortunately, banks apperceive that we charge their casework and abide to overcapitalize on our needs. Banks are apathetic to innovate compared to added industries because there is no cogent blackmail or antagonism in the market. These banking institutions additionally run oligopolies in about every country with abounding colluding with their absolute competitors.

Therefore, if banks do not advantage blockchain technology and startups can action above casework with lower fees, bodies will artlessly opt for the startup instead. These blockchain-based startups will canyon on their amount accumulation to their consumers and action them the added allowances of blockchain technology like bigger transparency, faster transaction times, and greater security. Since cyberbanking is a amount aboriginal market, bodies would not be afraid to try and about-face over to added companies, abnormally if the accommodation appears like a no-brainer.

Example: A startup arduous the cyberbanking giants

A abundant archetype of a aggregation attractive to agitate the absolute cyberbanking business archetypal is Lending Blocks, a blockchain-based startup which functions a bit like a bank. If consumers accept tokens in their savings, they may accommodation it out to added bodies on the blockchain in barter for interest.

Although the band-aid is alone accessible for agreement one badge as aegis to borrow another, if the abstraction proves successful, there will be added options including a tokenized authorization currency. The blockchain lending arrangement allows individuals to acquire added absorption based on bazaar conditions, with the base agent replaced by a software platform.

Lending Blocks is aloof one archetype to appearance how advancing small, active startups are admitting aggressive adjoin beyond incumbents that are already advancing blockchain technology. If banks weren’t proactive in implementing blockchain, it’d be almost accessible for these competitors to win over barter and agitate the bank’s ascendancy in the banking ecosystem.

While it may be a cogent bound for consumers to go from a trusted centralized academy to a decentralized associate to associate platform, if banks do not embrace blockchain technology, consumers will go to added competitors that action bigger value, alteration the power, control, and hierarchical anatomy of the avant-garde cyberbanking system.

Banks are about able-bodied acquainted of the appulse of blockchain technology. According to an Accenture report, nine out of 10 cyberbanking professionals mentioned that their aggregation is currently exploring the use of blockchain technology. While I’ve advised the abbreviate and abiding impacts of banks abnegation blockchain, it’s a awful absurd scenario, at atomic for developed nations.