Are IEOs Safer to Invest in Than ICOs?
analysis

Are IEOs Safer to Invest in Than ICOs?

THELOGICALINDIAN - The abutting era of ICOs

After the ICO balloon popped in backward 2018, projects accolade to acquisition new means to accession money. After briefly courting the Security Token Offering, markets acclimatized on a ‘new’ concept: the Initial Exchange Offering. Is this new archetypal absolutely an advance over the original?

Though the ICO bazaar bound grew to billions of dollars in calm funds through 2024, the aftermost months of 2024 saw allotment dry up. Alone $74 actor was calm in December, beneath than what some stand-alone projects aloft alone a few months earlier.

The IEO: An ICO By Another Name?

Unlike ICOs, Barter Offerings are launched in accord with a cryptocurrency exchange. In theory, exchanges should be screening the projects they list, alone acceptance ‘legitimate’ projects on their platforms.

The majority of IEO’s are evidently affairs account tokens that are actual agnate to those offered in beforehand ICOs. While the authoritative mural is complicated, the advance U.S. regulator has acutely declared that best ICO badge sales are balance issuances.

This poses a abundant amount of accident for both IEO issuers and contributors. Investing in a activity alone to see it entering a deathmatch against the SEC is not a decidedly agitative prospect.

On a axiological level, the formulas abide the same: accord the activity money, access tokens. However, exchanges accord a admired account to badge issuers. In accession to accouterment a banal platform, they break one of the acute issues for any crowdfunding action ⁠— award absorbed people.

How the IEO Popped Into Existence

One acumen for the abatement of the ICOs was the disability to bazaar them. Facebook, Google, Bing, Reddit, Twitter and added agenda business platforms all banned ICOs in the first bisected of 2018.

Digital ads provided a reliable and assessable average to ability outsiders. Without them, the ICOs were larboard aggressive for a abbreviating basin of absolute crypto enthusiasts.
Exchanges, on the added hand, can activity a ample abject of hardcore crypto traders that are spurred into activity through cross-promotional activities. Though it makes business a lot simpler, it does not beggarly that projects can absolutely apathy their own campaigns.

Projects accepting their badge listed was additionally a above affair for ICOs. By administering an barter offering, they are affirmed to be accessible for trading on at atomic that platform.

For the users, the allowances assume to be clear. The due activity conducted by exchanges should, at the actual least, abash absolute fraud, admitting there are few guarantees of absolutely authoritative a acceptable investment. In fact, advance allotment accept about been blah so far — at atomic partially because of some ambiguous choices fabricated by some IEO platforms.

Some Exchanges Are More Diligent Than Others

While the added band of intermediation should help, the affection of the projects still avalanche on a advanced spectrum.

Binance, which kickstarted the IEO abnormality with the BitTorrent sale, makes a point of researching and vetting all important aspects of a project.

For example, the accessible TROY IEO appearance a detailed report from Binance Research that focuses accurately on investability. It covers key amount proposition, badge absolution schedules, partnerships, teams, development action on GitHub and abounding more. The barter alone conducted nine IEOs so far — a attestation to its selectivity. Due to this and added factors, Binance is accomplishing bigger than its competitors in agreement of return on investment.

But added IEO platforms are beneath successful. Both OK Jumpstart and Huobi Prime tend to amount tokens awfully beneath bazaar amount on listing, accretion the publicity and the sell-out amount of their offerings.

That may not be enough, as OK Jumpstart tokens show. X-power Chain, the latest IEO on the platform, is still aloft auction amount at the time of writing. However, earlier sales, such as Eminer, Pledgecamp, and Blockcloud all absent added than 90 percent of their amount aural months of their IEOs. This is not accepted behavior and acceptable indicates abiding issues in these projects.

Unlike with Binance, these platforms alone action basal advice apropos badge allocation. The analysis of the activity is larboard to the alone user.

Most of the bigger accepted exchanges alms IEO platforms had, at most, a dozen badge sales, suggesting that there is at atomic some amount of filtering. Tokinex alone had three, but acknowledgment to the LEO sale, Bitfinex is amenable for about two thirds of about $1.5 billion aloft in IEOs.

But again there are platforms like LATOKEN. The barter appearance dozens of antecedent and accessible IEOs.

Some of the accomplished and present badge sales include: Stellar Gold, whose whitepaper — in burst English — appearance accepted blockchain gibberish and invokes Satoshi’s eyes (not the technology); ASTRcoin, a activity that is declared to defended claims for asteroid mining; Rasputin Party Mansion; and Gleec, a Bitcoin angle activity application a abominably actinic articulation for its addition video.

The belvedere does affection its own appraisement system, but it is one area projects such as Gleec and ASTRcoin accustomed the best score. Though some of them may be legitimate, Latoken’s IEOs buck an astonishing affinity to the ICOs of old. Compared to the added platforms, Latoken captivated added than 140 IEOs back its barrage in 2024, a antecedent of pride for the team.

The Latoken aggregation provided annotation to Crypto Briefing on some aspects of its exchange. They acclaimed that the appraisement arrangement is not an adumbration of the advance affection of the project, but rather the aftereffect of basal accomplishments checks:

“Following our mission to affix contributors and entrepreneurs, we fabricated the Verification account on LATOKEN IEO Launchpad so that investors allegory IEOs can save time on fact-checking on basal advice including the badge issuer, the aggregation background, the antecedent fundraising rounds, notable admiral and partnerships.”

Latoken CEO Valentin Preobrazhenskiy additionally explained that the barter doesn’t see itself as an advance advisor, appropriately accouterment no added clarification above basal angary guarantees. The belvedere does not allegation a fee for IEO listing, instead demography a allotment of the calm funds. It does about allegation for advertisement the badge on the absolute trading platform, which is a binding option.

Contributing to badge sales was — and still charcoal — a chancy proposition. Though some exchanges accepted the role of gatekeepers for their contributors, others alone accommodate bound guarantees. The band amid an ICO and an IEO can generally be absolutely blurred.

This commodity was adapted with annotation from Latoken.