Failure to Launch: The LedgerX Controversy
news

Failure to Launch: The LedgerX Controversy

THELOGICALINDIAN - LedgerX CEO Paul Chou is absolutely mad and allegedly his aggregation is not alms physicallysettled Bitcoin futures affairs yet

Failure to Launch

On Thursday LedgerX CEO Paul Chou beatific out a alternation of tweets answer the accepted LedgerX altercation and his accommodation to sue the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for what he calls ‘anti-competitive behavior’.

Chou alleges that the CFTC asked him to abridge LedgerX’s tweets and he accepted that they did but will “never again, this is a adversity for democracy”.

The affair appears to accept started on Wednesday back LedgerX announced that it had launched physically acclimatized Bitcoin futures contracts that were attainable to retail and institutional investors.

Chou told media that “not alone are they delivered physically in the faculty that our barter can get Bitcoin afterwards the futures expires, but additionally they can drop Bitcoin to barter in the aboriginal place.”  

Fast advanced to Thursday and LedgerX was affected to abjure this account as the CFTC claims it did not accommodate a derivatives allowance alignment (DCO) authorization to the firm.

Interestingly, a CFTC press release from June 25 says: 

A quick glance at LedgerX’s trading data folio additionally shows that options and swaps did action on Wednesday, but no futures affairs were processed. 

LedgerX Attempted to Exploit the 180-Day Rule

When asked about the discrepancy, LedgerX arch operations, and accident administrator Juthica Chou accepted that LedgerX was not trading futures affairs yet.

She antiseptic that LedgerX’s antecedent statements apropos physically-settled futures were anon referencing the firm’s retail platform, Omni. According to Juthica Chou, Omni is alive and processing swaps and options articles and she said, “We’re still operating, we’re putting the artefact in advanced of retail.” 

The CFTC did accept LedgerX as a appointed arrangement bazaar (DCM) in July but the close still requires a DCO authorization in adjustment to action futures.

CFTC regulations (Title 17 allotment 39.3) agree that the bureau has up to 180 canicule to accomplish a accommodation on DCO applications. Chou said that: 

LedgerX appears to accept affected that a absence approval would action if the 180 day aeon anesthetized after any accommodation from the CFTC. Juthica Chou said: 

Chou additionally said that “we accept email accord acknowledging that there were no added items that they bare for the amendment.” 

There’s a Light at the end of the Tunnel

An bearding CTFC official commented on the bearings and said this acceptance is awry as LedgerX requires absolute approval in adjustment to action futures.

According to the official, “the absence of a accommodation does not aggregate approval, and article self-certification is not an option.” 

On a added absolute note, the aforementioned official said that LedgerX’s DCO appliance “appears to be in the actual final stages of the approval process.” 

This is a developing adventure which will be adapted as added advice becomes available. 

Do you anticipate LedgerX carefully jumped the gun on announcement that it was accustomed to barrage physically-settled Bitcoin futures? Share your thoughts in the comments below! 

Image via Shutterstock, Twitter:@paul_l_chou