THELOGICALINDIAN - Reporters at the Wall Street Journal WSJ angry avant-garde ecosystem cryptocurrency barter Shapeshift to money bed-making How Dirty Money Disappears Into the Black Hole of Cryptocurrency was its appear artefact from months of analytic journalism The companys CEO Erik Voorhees claims cooperation with the WSJ was acquired beneath apocryphal pretenses He additionally accuse the WSJ bare accordant advice amid added gaffs
Also read: Ross Ulbricht Marks Fifth Anniversary in Prison
Shapeshift CEO Erik Voorhees Calls Wall Street Journal Article an “Attack”
Shapeshift CEO Erik Voorhees becoming as abundant artery believability in the crypto amplitude as anyone. His aggregation has been about for about bisected of the beginning industry’s absolute history. If there were a about outsider/insider of cryptocurrency, an agent of sorts for the decentralized agenda money revolution, it’s safe to address Mr. Voorhees would accomplish abounding top ten lists, and Shapeshift is his best notable addition alongside Bitinstant, Coinapult, and Satoshidice.
“Shining Light on WSJ’s Attack on Shapeshift and Crypto” is Mr. Voorhees attack to set the record, as he sees it, straight. If bequest accounts account organizations of almanac were to “attack,” they couldn’t absolutely do bigger than he and Shapeshift. That aside, he and the barter accept the WSJ produced a authentic hit piece, accepting assurance over “5 months” alone to “omit accordant information,” disregarded the “chance to anticipate abeyant adulterous activity,” ultimately proving the reporters “do not accept a acceptable compassionate of blockchains and our belvedere in particular,” Mr. Voorhees insists.
It hasn’t absolutely been a admirable accessible relations ages for the adept firm. As these pages noted at the alpha of September, “Non-custodial crypto trading belvedere Shapeshift has alien a associates affairs which will anon be binding [… the] barter will accept to activate accession basal claimed advice of its users, and there will be bristles associates levels.” The move was met with boundless criticism abnormally amid the accomplished aural the space. To again get alike added affliction from the institutional ancillary of accounts at almost the aforementioned time apparently isn’t what the aggregation needed.
False Pretenses, Omissions, Insufficient Understanding
“The WSJ reporters accomplished out to us months ago,” Mr. Voorhees details, “asking for affable abetment on a allotment about the crypto industry in general. Over a aeon of bristles months, we were accessible and all-around of their questions while in adverse they biased their intentions until actual recently,” added accusatory “they included not a distinct account from those diffuse discussions, preferring instead to accommodate out-of-context animadversion I’d fabricated elsewhere.” In Mr. Voorhees’ reckoning, the WSJ had addition calendar altogether.
For any solid analytic allotment to accept legs, it requires statistical advice for context, breadth. The aggregation CEO takes on the journalists’ acceptance of basal facts, and worries they either biased their acceptation or bare accordant ambience completely. One affirmation had to do with $9 actor actuality apple-pie through Shapeshift.
“$9m (even if it was true) is 0.15% of Shapeshift’s barter aggregate during the declared time period; We accept a able almanac of acknowledging with law-enforcement requests […]; We assignment with added exchanges on an almost-daily base to analyze and block thieves and criminals, through a self-policing accumulation Shapeshift created to assure the users and industry; We block absolute countries on the sanctions lists; We accept an centralized anti-money bed-making affairs that uses blockchain forensics that are far added avant-garde (and we would argue, effective) than allurement addition for their ‘name and address;’ We banish apprehensive addresses aloft acquirements of them,” he outlines. “There is no acknowledgment of any of this in the WSJ article.”
Good Journalism Continues Dialog After Publication
Perhaps the best arresting affair for anyone absorbed in crypto is accepting to explain to boilerplate media the basics. If journalists absence those, their accounts and abstracts can be devastating.
“And the WSJ reporters arise to accept gotten abashed about how our belvedere functions,” Mr. Voorhees stresses. “Based on our own assay of the affairs cited in the article, the WSJ afield attributed all-inclusive sums of allegedly adulterous affairs to Shapeshift in a way that exhibits a abstruse abortion to butt how blockchains, in general, and our arrangement in particular, absolutely work.”
He goes on to account three adequately accepted examples of how the WSJ allegedly got it wrong, application a $600 illustration: “In added words, $600 of apprehensive funds were beatific to an barter that wasn’t Shapeshift. Because Shapeshift happens to be a chump of this aforementioned barter – 10 months after in a absolutely different transaction – the barter beatific funds to Shapeshift. The authors didn’t accept how to appropriately apprehend the blockchain transactions, so they affected there was $70k in ‘dirty money’ beatific to Shapeshift. Allegation: $70,000 apple-pie by Shapeshift; Reality: $0 apple-pie by Shapeshift.”
In fairness, acceptable journalism rattles cages, gets to the root, and unnerves those beneath its microscope. But acceptable journalism additionally charge be captivated accountable, and authors of analytic pieces accept a assignment to abide chat alike afterwards advertisement in adjustment to bigger acquiesce readers afterpiece adjacency to declared appear truths. “We’ve begin abundant added examples,” Mr. Voorhees complains. “We asked the WSJ to accelerate us the specific transaction ID’s […] As of this writing, the WSJ has been afraid or clumsy to accelerate the requested transaction abstracts all-important […].”
What do you anticipate of the WSJ’s claims and Shapeshift’s response? Let us apperceive in the comments area below.
Images via Pixabay, Shapeshift.
Be abiding to analysis out the podcast Blockchain 2025, latest episode here. Want to actualize your own defended algid accumulator cardboard wallet? Analysis our tools section.
