$136M Lost as Cream Finance Suffers Another Flash Loan Attack
analysis

$136M Lost as Cream Finance Suffers Another Flash Loan Attack

THELOGICALINDIAN - DeFi lending agreement Cream Finance has been hit by addition beam accommodation advance This time the antagonist blanket about 136 actor account of DeFi tokens

Decentralized lending agreement Cream Finance has been hit by a above beam accommodation attack. The aggressor adopted $2 billion from Aave and fabricated off with over $136 actor account of Ethereum-based tokens.

Cream Finance Hit By Another Flash Loan Attack

Cream Finance has been exploited. 

An antagonist auspiciously acclimated a beam accommodation beforehand today to borrow 524,102.159 ETH from Aave, account about $2 billion at today’s prices. They again auspiciously drained Cream Finance of several DeFi tokens, authoritative off with about $136 actor at aiguille prices according to Zerion. The transaction for the advance amount $36,574.34 and can be beheld on Etherscan.

The acute arrangement auditing close PeckShield bankrupt the account of the advance on Twitter this afternoon, while Cream Finance appear that it was “investigating an accomplishment on C.R.E.A.M. v1 on Ethereum.” The aggregation added that it would allotment added updates as anon as they’re available. 

The Etherscan transaction history shows that the antagonist confused at atomic $92 actor to one Ethereum wallet and $23 actor to another. The baseborn funds were mostly comprised mainly of Cream LP tokens, which can be becoming for accouterment clamminess to the protocol, as able-bodied as XSUSHI, WNXM, YFI, and several added ERC-20 tokens and stablecoins. 

In the ascribe abstracts for the transaction, the antagonist larboard the afterward message:

“gÃTµ Baave lucky, adamant coffer lucky, chrism not. ydev : incest bad, dont do”

The bulletin acceptable refers to Cream Finance’s Iron Bank, which Alpha Finance uses in affiliation with Cream. Alpha Finance acquaint an update acknowledging that Iron Bank and its Alpha Homora V2 artefact were “safe” afterward the attack. Yearn Finance additionally acquaint an update acknowledging that its articles accept not been afflicted and its aggregation was “assisting Cream with analysis of the exploit.”

Interestingly, the wallet absolute the majority of the attacker’s baseborn funds accustomed a transaction from a user with the Ethereum Name Service area oilysirs.eth afterward the attack. The transaction independent a bulletin that warned the antagonist that they “are NGMI” because they “will never be able to banknote that bulk out.” “NGMI” is a accepted meme in the crypto community. It’s about acclimated as an insult, acceptation “Not Going to Make It.”

Following the attack, crypto broker and researcher Adam Cochran noted that Cream’s staked Ethereum 2.0 account is custodial, suggesting that users may be reimbursed for the baseborn Cream LP tokens.

The antagonist additionally acclimated the DeFi barter aggregator ParaSwap to catechumen tokens like AAVE and PERP for ETH and USDC. They additionally acclimated Ren’s arch to move over $6 actor into BTC.

The total amount locked on the agreement has diminished by 72%, while the amount of Cream’s built-in babyminding badge CREAM has plummeted by about 27%, trading at $114 at the time of writing.

Notably, this isn’t the aboriginal time Cream Finance has been hit by a astringent attack. The agreement lost $34 million in a agnate accomplishment alone in August, admitting the antagonist later returned a allocation of the funds. 

Editor’s note: This is a developing adventure and will be adapted as capacity emerge. 

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the columnist of this affection endemic ETH and xSUSHI.